Skip to main content

A Horse A Piece

Talking about family quirks, Anne came up with another interesting phrase.  She says her sister from Wisconsin says "a horse a piece" meaning "either way".  So it would be the equivalent of "six of one, half dozen of the other".  

The first long explanation I saw for this was at Everything Summer Camp.

It comes from a situation in a game where a player is trying to win a best-of-three match and each player has one win, so "one win apiece" eases into "a horse apiece".  This feels most likely to me.

I can see a link back to a friendly (or not so friendly) game of bar dice where, in the final best-of-three showdown, if you lose the first game, it's "a horse against you" or "a horse on you", after which, if the other player wins the second game, you would clearly have "a horse apiece."   A lot of gambling games have the tokens or stakes nicknamed "horses".

There's a bit of a time shift going on here, though.  For the third game, the loser has to buy everyone a round of drinks, so it very much does matter.  But at the moment you have a horse apiece, nothing you did up to that point mattered, the outcome is no closer to having been decided.  But the phrase is used as "either way" or "it makes no difference", not "so far, nothing we did many any difference."  Language is complex, and words and phrases catch on for unfathomable reasons.

I found some very old uses, but they all sound like a gambler's take on the situation.  None is convincing as evidence of anything other than the gambling origin.

Reddit had this hilarious romp through idioms.

Anne thought it was the same as "Catch-22" (from the book of the same name by Joseph Heller, 1961), but "Catch-22" was meant to be used for the very specific case where there is an unbreakable loop of circular reasoning: goal A requires goal B, which requires goal A, so there is no actual solution.  It can also be used for any no-win situation, although a fair chunk of the population would now call that a Kobiyashi Maru -- thanks to Captain Kirk at the start of The Wrath of Khan.  Usage can split either by intention or by error.  This is an interesting case, but it's not "a horse apiece".

One last note: it bugs me how many articles quote this phrase as "A Horse A Piece," which makes no sense.  It's clearly "a horse apiece", same as if we had just a dollar apiece.  But sometimes idioms take on a life of their own, and may even break grammar, again for unfathomable reasons ... that's just how it came out after millions or billions of uses.  So, whichever way you write it, it feels like a case of itself: "a horse a piece."  Does it really matter?

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A STORY about STOREY

Here is another case where two words differ in American/British meaning based on an extra E: STORY and STOREY. You can tell a STORY, it's a piece of narration or fiction, or a news story.  I don't normally think of it as a verb, but it can be.  I would normally say I was telling a STORY, but I could be STORYING.  Having finished the STORY, I suppose I am all STORIED out.  But, STORIED fits as an adjective too: if many stories have been told about you, you have lived a STORIED life. STOREY is a floor in a house, and to make matters a little more complex, in the British Isles, what we call the first floor (Am) is the ground floor and our second floor is their first storey (floor).  A taller building could have multiple STOREYS.  Merriam-Webster says that this STOREY is just a less common version of STORY, but it always felt to me like a specifically British version.  Cambridge has STOREYED, which would be used as an adjective, as in "a three-storeyed ho...
Post a Comment
Read more

Poor Frankenstein

Names can get mixed up, too. Real or fictional people can become legends, or end up garbled and forgotten. A classic case is poor Frankenstein. If you're picturing the big lumbering monster with the bolts in his neck ... oops. Frankenstein was the doctor who created the monster. The monster was simply known as "the monster" or "Frankenstein's Monster." Strangely, "Franken-" has become a prefix on its own. I've heard big ugly things named that way, from a Frankencouch to a Frankenpuppy. I wonder if this was urged along by the old FrankenBerry cereal? Sure is a weird thing to make a prefix out of, especially considering the original Franken- thing was not a monster, but a mad scientist. Now, where does Al Franken fit into all this?
2 comments
Read more

Similar but Not: Byre/Bier

Sometimes when rushing through a puzzle app, swiping words so quickly, the actual words can become a blur.  I am used to telling Anne about alternate American/English versions of words, like COLOR (Am) vs COLOUR (Eng) and NITER (Am) vs NITRE (Eng).  So I got into a blur where I ended up thinking BYRE and BIER were the same word, just different dialect spellings. But no, a BYRE is a shed for a cow, and a BIER is a typically wooden platform for carrying the dead.  So, if you have cattle, you can get them into the BYRE, but if you have a corpse or coffin to carry to a gravesite, a BIER would be the thing. In German, BIER is just BEER. And while swiping those letters, I misspelled BIER as BRIE, which is a soft spreadable cheese, like cream cheese.  I can't remember the last time I actually had some, but I seem to recall it looked like cream cheese but tasted skunky and awful.
Post a Comment
Read more