WordFixx

On the radio on the way home a few nights ago, we had Mark Thompson filling in for Tim Conway Jr, and the show came back from a commercial break with an mellow old-school rap song intro, and he improvised his return with "Yo, yo, yo!" ... and then immediately got self-conscious about it. It turned into an actual linguistic discussion about where "Yo!" came from and where it's at today.  He felt it was an 80s or 90s thing.  It was never really a replacement for "Hello," but technically an interjection, and specifically used to get someone's attention. The other guys at the station felt it was outdated and confrontational.  Oddly, they might still use it to call attention to something, or to show surprise at something, but they would never use it in text messaging.  Or they would find it comically lame when older people used it in a text.  I thought it was interesting that usage can be so specific that a word leaves different impressions depending on

New words are always appearing, but most of them disappear before ever making it into a proper dictionary.  Each individual has their own unique overall set of words and pronunciations, known as their "idiolect".  The next step above that is how small groups of people who get together regularly may share a few unique phrases within that group, but when they try to speak to people outside the group, those phrases will fall flat.  With our hyper-connected world, there are so many layers of language, it gets confusing. I'm regularly surprised that none of the word games we've tried will take NOOB or DERP.  I have been hearing people calling each other noobs for 5-10 years now, or saying "derp" as a sort of "oops", and calling things "derpy."  I suppose this is mostly in the realm of video gaming, but it spilled over into regular conversations a while ago. An interesting case that's currently developing is YEET.  I first heard it while pl

After watching more word history videos and reading more articles, I have had this phrase stuck in my head all week long: "How do you get a clowder of cats from a chaos of kittens?" There are a lot of bizarre names for groups of animals (and people) in English.  Most of us have heard of a FLOCK of sheep or birds, a SWARM of bees, or a SCHOOL of fish.  Maybe you've heard of a MURDER of crows.  But believe me, this list goes on and on (and on), with weird and wild phrases that come as go as language evolves.  Here's a good overview video from Rob Words . One of the earliest big lists of these can be found in "The Book of Saint Albans" from 1486.  It was one of those gentleman's guidebooks that have been with us for centuries.  Here is an edition from the Gutenberg Project - you can get to the list by doing a text search for "Swannys", just after the halfway point in the document.  This list has extremely antiquated spellings, but some of the col

There is a certain amount of linguistic Zen that comes from playing simple word unscrambler games, spinning around the question of why some words are accepted and others are not.  A few nights back we played UNRULY, and for fun, I tried RULY on a whim, and the game accepted it, when I know other games have rejected it.  I tried explaining it to Anne.  It felt like a word to me, and it's in Merriam-Webster with the same example I thought of at the time: "I have seen some ruly crowds."  It turns out that MW has a fascinating story about these two words, see here .  "Ruly" did exist for centuries, got replaced by UNRULY, only to come back as a back-formation from UNRULY to fill the gap it once filled.   It turns out that these cases are considered "Lost positives", words where the positive root word has faded from usage while the negation of the word is still going strong.  Here is a video from RobWords that gives a good overview.  I have been enjoying h