Skip to main content

Intro to WordFixx

I have always enjoyed folklore, and as a writer for the past 20 years I've used my share of words, so I don't know why it took so long to realize that I had accumulated a lot of stories about words. Word lore. I get a kick out of the streams of words that appear during conversations, each with its own history -- an insanely creative flow of bits and pieces accumulated over centuries. On the flipside, I'm a bit concerned when I talk to other writers who have no idea of what they're tapping into. I guess if you're writing technical documents, your main focus is accuracy, but my poet half won't let me stop there. I think there is a lot to be gained by understanding the words we use, or, a lot to be lost by forgetting their meanings and history.

Few things are as important to a culture as their language. Words can last for ages, words are part of our identity, and we can discover historical hints hidden in our word lore. Even more, every job has its own vocabulary (jargon), its own subculture. When you listen to someone speak, the words they use say more about them that you might realize -- we process most of this instinctively, and it's a fascinating topic. There are language experts and forensic analysts who can tap this hidden world to great advantage.

If all that is too deep, a good word story makes an interesting conversation piece.

This series will focus on "stories behind the words." I'm not looking for dry etymologies. I'm more interested in the creative ways that words sneak into our language, a.k.a. the "human factor," and the little bits of the past that linger. I will try to be as accurate as I can, but please realize that there is still much debate on some of these items. I hope you will find it as interesting as I do. I don't expect to have time to manage long comment-wars over individual items.

As for the new of this blog, I didn't really expect "WordLore" to be available. Neither was "WordFix" ... but I was listening to "The Fixx" at the time, and "WordFixx" just happened. Funny moment.

About me: I've had over 450 stories & poems published since 1986, including works in Analog, Space & Time, and about 100 other places. I've always enjoyed words. I started college as a Linguistics major (studying German, French, Spanish, Latin, Middle English and Sanskrit), but switched to Mathematics/Physics. I skipped Computer Science entirely, but ended up writing software and websites for a living anyway. That's the short version.
My writing home page is [ here ].

Some of my common sources:

  • DC = dictionary.com

  • EO = etymonline.com

  • FD = thefreedictionary.com

  • WO = Word Origins, by Anatoly Lieberman.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Poor Frankenstein

Names can get mixed up, too. Real or fictional people can become legends, or end up garbled and forgotten. A classic case is poor Frankenstein. If you're picturing the big lumbering monster with the bolts in his neck ... oops. Frankenstein was the doctor who created the monster. The monster was simply known as "the monster" or "Frankenstein's Monster." Strangely, "Franken-" has become a prefix on its own. I've heard big ugly things named that way, from a Frankencouch to a Frankenpuppy. I wonder if this was urged along by the old FrankenBerry cereal? Sure is a weird thing to make a prefix out of, especially considering the original Franken- thing was not a monster, but a mad scientist. Now, where does Al Franken fit into all this?

RULY, RECK, and RobWords

There is a certain amount of linguistic Zen that comes from playing simple word unscrambler games, spinning around the question of why some words are accepted and others are not.  A few nights back we played UNRULY, and for fun, I tried RULY on a whim, and the game accepted it, when I know other games have rejected it.  I tried explaining it to Anne.  It felt like a word to me, and it's in Merriam-Webster with the same example I thought of at the time: "I have seen some ruly crowds."  It turns out that MW has a fascinating story about these two words, see here .  "Ruly" did exist for centuries, got replaced by UNRULY, only to come back as a back-formation from UNRULY to fill the gap it once filled.   It turns out that these cases are considered "Lost positives", words where the positive root word has faded from usage while the negation of the word is still going strong.  Here is a video from RobWords that gives a good overview.  I have been enjoy...

why not SQUUUSH?

There is a strange and cartoony clump of words centered around SQUISH, or the idea or sound of squishing things.  This includes SQUUSH, SQUSH, and SQUOOSH, and an Ngram view of these shows all kinds of ups and downs in the noise of word history ... The first of these to appear was SQUSH, around 1830, and it was used in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, chapter 29.  SQUUSH came about in 1850, peaked well below the others in 1970 and is headed down to obscurity these days, while SQUOOSH first gets a blip around 1880 and had a big upturn from 1950 to 2010, but it now sinking as, much to my surprise, SQUSH is taking off. Since these are all verbs, they have the full range of strange-looking endings which would be fun for a Scrabble night: SQUUSHED, SQUUSHES, SQUUSHING, SQUSHED, SQUSHES, SQUSHING, SQUOOSHED, SQUOOSHES, SQUOOSHING and can be turned into adjectives as SQUSHY, SQUUSHY and SQUOOSHY. OMG, it's never ending, there are comparative versions SQUSHIER, SQUUSHIER, SQUOOSHI...